Two tactics to combat bourgeois historiography: S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein
- Autores: Slepenko I.1
 - 
							Afiliações: 
							
- Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences
 
 - Edição: Nº 2 (2025)
 - Páginas: 187-193
 - Seção: Profession and community
 - URL: https://edgccjournal.org/2949-124X/article/view/685999
 - DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2949124X25020252
 - EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDRELW
 - ID: 685999
 
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The article considers strategies of interaction of historians with ideological processes, that occurred in Soviet historical science in the early 1930s. It compares the approaches of S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein. Piontkovsky is known for his tactic of active participating in these processes, while Rubinshtein follows a passive approach that involves maximizing the use of authoritative quotes.
Texto integral
Sobre autores
Ilya Slepenko
Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences
							Autor responsável pela correspondência
							Email: otech_ist@mail.ru
				                					                																			                								
graduate student				                	Rússia, 							Moscow						
									Bibliografia
Arquivos suplementares
				
			
						
						
					
						
						
									


