Environmental Dynamics and Global Climate ChangeEnvironmental Dynamics and Global Climate ChangeEnvironmental Dynamics and Global Climate Change2218-44222541-9307Yugra State University10593010.18822/edgcc105930Theoretical worksТеоретические работыResearch ArticleWater use and ecosystem services: A case of RussiaMoiseevTimofey D.
Russian Federation

GIS - specialist

ГИС - специалист

moiseevt115@gmail.comGaripovaSofya T.
Russian Federation

junior researcher of laboratory of neotectonics and recent geodynamics

младший научный сотрудник лаборатории неотектоники и современной геодинамики

garipovasofya@ginras.ruHuntmapООО "Хантмеп"Geological Institute of Russian Academy of SciencesГеологический Институт Российской Академии Наук16112022132606904042022Copyright ©; 2022, Moiseev T.D., Garipova S.T.Copyright ©; 2022, Moiseev T.D., Garipova S.T.2022Moiseev T.D., Garipova S.T.Moiseev T.D., Garipova S.T.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0https://edgccjournal.org/EDGCC/article/view/105930

The article is focused on the possibility of implementing ecosystem services (ES) in water management system of Russia. Examples of international practice ES-oriented water use policy are reviewed. Modern structure of water use system in Russia is presented. The main environmental problems of Russia in connection with ES according to Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) are summarized. As a result, the authors propose a roadmap for reforming water use based on ES in order to improve water management. Key positions of possibility way of development Russia's water use system are highlighted and recommendations are given due to sustainable development goals.

The article is focused on the possibility of implementing ecosystem services (ES) in water management system of Russia. Examples of international practice ES-oriented water use policy are reviewed. Modern structure of water use system in Russia is presented. The main environmental problems of Russia in connection with ES according to Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) are summarized. As a result, the authors propose a roadmap for reforming water use based on ES in order to improve water management. Key positions of possibility way of development Russia's water use system are highlighted and recommendations are given due to sustainable development goals.

Ecosystem services, water use, water management, water policy, environmental management, green economy, sustainable development, water resources, CICES.Ecosystem services, water use, water management, water policy, environmental management, green economy, sustainable development, water resources, CICES.A Tool for Integrated Flood Management. APFM Technical Document. Flood Management Tools Series. World Meteorolog-ical Organization. No. 21. 2012. P. 36. https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=7336. Cited March 16, 2022.Andreeva, E.E. 2014. Hygienic assessment of water quality of surface water bodies in Moscow // Preventive and Clinical Medicine. V. 52. N. 3. pp. 51–57.Briones-Hidrovo A., Uche J., Martínez-Gracia A. 2019. Estimating the hidden ecological costs of hydropower through an ES balance: A case study from Ecuador // Journal of Cleaner Production. V. 233. P. 33–42. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.068.Mapulanga A. M., Naito H. 2019. Effect of deforestation on access to clean drinking water // Proceedings of the National Acad-emy of Sciences. V. 117. N. 17. P. 8249–8254. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1814970116.Arefieva O., Nazarkina A., Gruschakova N., Skurikhina Y., Kolycheva V. 2019. Impact of mine waters on chemical compo-sition of soil in the Partizansk Coal Basin, Russia // International Soil and Water Conservation Research. V. 7. P.12. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.01.001Ayzel Georgy. 2021. OpenForecast v2: Development and Benchmarking of the First National-Scale Operational Runoff Forecasting System in Russia // Hydrology. V. 8. P. 3. DOI:10.3390/hydrology8010003Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., Van Den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the wоrld’s ES and natural capital // Nature. V. 387. P. 253–260. DOI:10.1038/387253a0Curt Forsberg. 1998. Which policies can stop large scale eutrophication? // Water science and Technology. V. 37. P. 193–200. DOI:10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00070-5Dinah Bear. 2014. Integration of ES Valuation Analysis into National Environmental Policy Act Compliance: Legal and Policy Perspectives. In Federal Resource Management and ES Guidebook. Durham: National ES Partnership, Duke University. P. 21. www.nespguidebook.com. Cited March 15, 2022.Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. 2000. Official Journal of the European Communities. P. 72.Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration. 2006. Official Journal of the European Communities. P. 13.Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. 2007. Official Journal of the European Communities. P. 8.Dobrovol’skii, S.G., Istomina, M.N. 2009. Characteristics of floods on the territory of Russia with regard to their natural and socioeconomic parameters // Water Resources and the Regime of Water Bodies. V. 36. P. 491–506. DOI: 10.1134/S0097807809050017Dontsova E.V. 2010. Inter-Group Conflicts at the Russian State Authorities: the Case of the Federal Water Resources Agency // Izvestiya of Saratov University. New series. Series Sociology. Political Science. V. 10. N. 3. P. 50–54.Dushkova D., Evseev A. 2011. Аnalisys of technogenic impact on geosystems of the Еuropean Russian North. Arctic and North. N. 4. P. 162–195.EnviroAtlas. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/enviroatlas. Cited March 1, 2022.Grizzetti B; Liquete Garcia M; Antunes P; Carvalho L; Geamănă N; Giucă R; Leone M; Mcconnell S; Preda E; Santos R; Turkelboom F; Vădineanu A; Woods H. 2016. ES for water policy: insights across Europe // Environmental science and policy. V. 6. P. 179–190. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.006Ground Water Rule (GWR). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/ground-water-rule. Cited March 12, 2022.International Decade for Action, Water for Sustainable Development, 2018 – 2028. Resolution adopted by the General As-sembly on 21 December 2016. P. 5.Jan Corfee-Morlot, Martin Berg and Georg Caspary. Exploring linkages between natural resources management and climate adaptation strategies. OCDE. 2003. P. 37.John-Mark Davies, Asit Masumder. 2003. Health and environmental policy issues in Canada: the role of watershed manage-ment in sustaining clean drinking water quality at surface sources // Environ Manage. V. 68. N. 3. P.273–286. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00070-7Gérin-Lajoie, J., Herrmann, T.M., MacMillan, G.A., Hébert-Houle, É., Monfette, M., Rowell, J.A., Soucie T.A., Snowball H., Townley E., Lévesque E., Amyot M., Franssen J., Dedieu J.P. 2018. IMALIRIJIIT: a community-based environmental monitoring program in the George River watershed, Nunavik, Canada // Écoscience. V. 25. N. 4. P. 381–399. DOI:10.1080/11956860.2018.1498226Kefner N.M., Morgun A.V. 2020. Environmental non-profit organizations in the Russian Federation under conditions of ad-aptation of the law “onforeign agents”; consequences and methods of adaptation. // The conference: Development of Political Institutions and Processes: Foreign and Domestic Experience. P. 320 - 330.Kireeva M., Frolova N., Rets E., Samsonov T., Entin A., Kharlamov M., Telegina E., Povalishnikova E. 2019. Evaluating climate and water regime transformation in the European Part of Russia using observation and reanalysis data for the 1945-2015 period // International Journal of River Basin Management. V. 18. N. 2. P. 1–29. DOI:10.1080/15715124.2019.1695258.Krupskaya V.V., Biryukov D.V., Belousov P.E., Lekhov V.A., Romanchuk A.Yu., Kalmykov S.N. 2018. The use of natural clay materials to increase the nuclear and radiation safety of nuclear legacy facilities // Radioactive Waste. N. 23. P.30-43.Carvalho, L., Mackay, E.B., Cardoso, A.C., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Birk, S., Blackstock, K.L., Borics G., Borja A., Feld C.K., Ferreira M.T., Globevnik L., Grizzetti B., Hendry S., Hering D., Kelly M., Langaas S., Meissner K., Panagopoulos Y., Penning E., Rouillard J., Sabater S., Schmedtje U., Spears B.M., Venohr M., Bund W., Solheim, A.L. 2019. Protecting and restoring Europe's waters: An analysis of the future development needs of the Water Framework Directive // Science of the Total Environment. V. 658. P. 1228–1238. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.255.Luk’yanchikov V.M., Luk’yanchikova L.G., Plotnikova R.I., Baron V.A., Chelidze Y.B. 2016. Resource base of underground waters of the Russian Federation: state of knowledge, problems of reproduction and use. // In: Razvedka i okhrana nedr Exploration and protection of mineral resources. N. 9. P. 129–136.Malkovsky V.I., Yudintsev S.V., Sharaputa M.K., Chulkov N.V. 2019. Influence of buoyancy forces on movement of liquid radioactive waste from deep injection disposal site in the Tomsk region, Russian Federation: analytical estimate and numerical modeling. Environmental Earth Sciences. V. 78. DOI:10.1007/s12665-019-8209-0.Malkovsky V., Miroshnikov A., Yudintsev S. 2020. Remediation of old subsurface repositories of radioactive waste, Russia: efficiency analysis // Environmental Earth Sciences. V. 79. DOI:10.1007/s12665-020-08963-yMitina N., Vashchenko M., Shumakova E. 2020. Modern problems of state regulation of operation of a large hydroelectric plants dams area. E3S Web of Conferences. DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202016303011.Muñoz-Piña, C., Guevara, A., Torres, J. M., Braña, J. 2008. Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results // Ecological Economics. V. 65. P. 725–736.National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1970. https://www.epa.gov/nepa. Cited March 15, 2022.National ES Partnership. Federal Resource Management and ES Guidebook. 2016. 2nd ed. Durham: National ES Partnership, Duke University, https://nespguidebook.com.Norten Ugyen. Impact of Water Management strategies-Payment for ES (PES) in Bhutan // International Journal of Innovative Research & Growth. 2021. V. 2. N. 8. P. 1–36.Pykhtin A., Tomakov M., Tomakova I., Anikina I., Brezhneva A. 2019. Problems of rational use and protection of groundwater within the Russian Federation. // Journal of Applied Engineering Science. V. 17. N. 3. P. 425–430. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2018/5.1/S20.087.Ortiz R., Núñez A., Cathala C., Rios A.R., Nalesso M. 2021. Water in the Time of Drought II: Lessons from Droughts around the World. P. 56.Report on the functioning of the Unified Energy System of Russia in 2020. Russian power system operator. https://www.so-ups.ru/fileadmin/files/company/reports/disclosure/2021/ups_rep2020.pdf. Cited March 10, 2022.Rozumovich, I. 2020. SUSTAINABLE WATER USE DOCTRINE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Scientific Notes of V. I. // Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science. V. 72. N. 6. P. 383–391. DOI:10.37279/2413-1733-2020-6-2-383-391.Ruban G., Khodorevskaya R., Shatunovskii M. 2019. Factors influencing the natural reproduction decline in the beluga (Huso huso , Linnaeus, 1758), Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii, Brandt & Ratzeburg, 1833), and stellate sturgeon (A. stellatus , Pallas, 1771) of the Volga-Caspian basin: A review // Journal of Applied Ichthyology. V. 35. P. 387–395. DOI: 10.1111/jai.13885Rybnikova L., Rybnikov P. 2019. Regularities in the Evolution of Groundwater Quality at Abandoned Copper Sulfide Mines at the Levikha Ore Field, Central Urals, Russia. Geochemistry International. V. 57. P. 298-313. DOI: 10.1134/S0016702919030091Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1974. https://www.epa.gov/sdwa. Cited March 15, 2022.Scarlett L., Maillett E. 2014. Incorporating Consideration of ES into Plans for the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge. In Federal Resource Management and ES Guidebook. Durham: National ES Partnership, Duke University. P. 14. www.nespguidebook.com. Cited March 15, 2022.Scarlett L., Maillett E. 2014. Using an ES Management Framework to Pursue Watershed-Wide Project Priorities in the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge and Connecticut River Watershed.” In Federal Resource Management and ES Guidebook. Durham: National ES Partnership, Duke University. P. 16. www.nespguidebook.com. Cited March 16, 2022.Schaefer, M., Goldman, E., Bartuska, A. M., Sutton-Grier, A., Lubchenco, J. 2015. Nature as capital: Advancing and incor-porating ES in United States federal policies and programs. // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. V. 112. N. 24. P. 7383–7389. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1420500112.Scheme of integrated use and protection of water bodies in the Don Basin. Federal Water Resources Agency. http://www.donbvu.ru/activities/use_and_protection_don/. Cited March 2, 2022.Shalikovskiy, A., Kurganovich, K.A. 2016. Flood hazard and risk assessment in Russia. Natural Hazard. V. 88. P. 133–147. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2681-6.State report «On the state and use of water resources of the Russian Federation in 2018». M: NIA-Priroda. 2019. P. 290.Teaming with Life: Investing in Science to Understand and Use America's Living Capital. A Report to the President by The Biodiversity and Ecosystems Panel of the President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. 1998. P. 105. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-teamingwithlife.pdf. Cited March 5, 2022.The Common International Classification of ES (CICES). https://cices.eu/. Cited March 15, 2022.The Federal Service for Supervision of Natural Resources. https://rpn.gov.ru/. Cited March 1, 2022.The unhealthy "Revitalisation of the Volga": a federal project fails to meet its primary objective. Accounts Chamber of Russian Federation. https://ach.gov.ru/checks/12502/. Cited March 1, 2022.The United Nations, Sustainable development goals. Goal 6: Ensure access to water and sanitation for all. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment /water-and-sanitation/. Cited March 14, 2022.Giakoumis T., Voulvoulis N. 2018. The transition of EU water policy towards the water framework directive’s integrated river basin management paradigm // Environmental management. V. 62. P. 819–831. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1080-z.Tomakov M.V., Tomakov V.I., Bokinov D.V., Andrienko V.V., Pashkova M.E. 2018. Rational use and protection of groundwater on the territory of Russian Federation - the main environmental tasks of the country // Proceedings of South-West State University. Series Technics and Technologies. V. 8. N. 2. P. 118–128.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/. Cited March 10, 2022Water Code of the Russian Federation of 03.06.2006 No. 74-FZ (as amended on 30.12.2021) (with amendments and additions, in force from 01.03.2022).Water security and ecosystem services: The critical connection. UNEP. 2009. P. 54.