<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Environmental Dynamics and Global Climate Change</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Environmental Dynamics and Global Climate Change</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Environmental Dynamics and Global Climate Change</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2218-4422</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2541-9307</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Yugra State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">635041</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18822/edgcc635041</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Theoretical works</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Теоретические работы</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Effects of temperature and precipitation anomalies on carbon dioxide and latent heat fluxes in wetland ecosystems</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Effects of temperature and precipitation anomalies on carbon dioxide and latent heat fluxes in wetland ecosystems</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7086-2814</contrib-id><name><surname>Satosina</surname><given-names>E. М.</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>аспирант на кафедре метеорологии и климатологии, географический факультет, младший научный сотрудник в лаборатории эколого-климатических исследований в ИПЭЭ</p></bio><email>lisan.sat@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gushchina</surname><given-names>D. Yu.</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>географический факультет, кафедра метеорологии и климатологии</p></bio><email>dasha155@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-3088</contrib-id><name><surname>Tarasova</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>географический факультет, кафедра метеорологии и климатологии</p></bio><email>mkolennikova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gibadullin</surname><given-names>R. R.</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>географический факультет, кафедра метеорологии и климатологии</p></bio><email>ravil00121@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zheleznova</surname><given-names>I. V.</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>географический факультет, кафедра метеорологии и климатологии</p></bio><email>zheleznovaiv@my.msu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Emelianova</surname><given-names>E. R.</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>laboratory of ecological and climatic research</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>лаборатория эколого-климатических исследований</p></bio><email>katikget@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Osipov</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>географический факультет, кафедра метеорологии и климатологии</p></bio><email>sashaosipov@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Olchev</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>географический факультет, кафедра метеорологии и климатологии</p></bio><email>aoltche@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Science</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт проблем экологии и эволюции имени А.Н. Северцова РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff4"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт проблем экологии и эволюции имени А.Н. Северцова РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-12-03" publication-format="electronic"><day>03</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-08-09"><day>09</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2024, Satosina E.М., Gushchina D.Y., Tarasova M.A., Gibadullin R.R., Zheleznova I.V., Emelianova E.R., Osipov A.M., Olchev A.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2024, Satosina E.М., Gushchina D.Y., Tarasova M.A., Gibadullin R.R., Zheleznova I.V., Emelianova E.R., Osipov A.M., Olchev A.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Satosina E.М., Gushchina D.Y., Tarasova M.A., Gibadullin R.R., Zheleznova I.V., Emelianova E.R., Osipov A.M., Olchev A.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Satosina E.М., Gushchina D.Y., Tarasova M.A., Gibadullin R.R., Zheleznova I.V., Emelianova E.R., Osipov A.M., Olchev A.V.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://edgccjournal.org/EDGCC/article/view/635041">https://edgccjournal.org/EDGCC/article/view/635041</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This study conducted a comprehensive assessment of the response of wetland ecosystems in temperate and polar latitudes, located on different continents, to extreme weather events. These events included temperature anomalies (unusually high/low temperatures) and precipitation anomalies (droughts/intense precipitation). The analysis of the response net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO<sub>2</sub> and latent heat (LE) fluxes to extreme temperature and precipitation events used ERA5 reanalysis data [Smith, 2011] and observations of CO<sub>2</sub> and LE fluxes from the global FLUXNET database [https://fluxnet.org/data/]. Fifteen greenhouse gas flux monitoring stations were selected for the study, representing the longest and most continuous time series of observations. These stations are located on different continents, with eight stations in temperate latitudes and seven in polar regions. It should be noted that this study focused exclusively on the warm season. The beginning and end of the warm season were defined as the sustained crossing of the daily mean air temperature above 0°C for at least seven consecutive days.</p> <p>For each station, daily anomalies of CO<sub>2</sub> and LE fluxes were calculated as the deviation from the long-term mean values for the corresponding day of the year. Extremely high/low values of flux anomalies were identified as exceeding one standard deviation from the overall time series for each calendar month individually.</p> <p>To identify periods with extreme air temperature values, ERA5 reanalysis data on two-meter air temperature every 3 hours with a spatial resolution of 0.25°×0.25° from 1991 to 2021 were used. To estimate extreme precipitation amounts, data from half-hourly station observations were used. Daily means were calculated from these data in a first step. Thresholds for defining extremely hot/cold periods were calculated as daily mean air temperature exceeding the 95th percentile (for anomalously hot periods) or not exceeding the 5th percentile (for anomalously cold periods) of a normal distribution with mean and standard deviation. The distribution was constructed for a specific month of the year and then averaged over the entire period considered. Two approaches were used to determine the extreme precipitation threshold. In the first approach, extreme precipitation days were defined as days with daily precipitation exceeding the 95th percentile of the probability density function (the Weibull distribution was used for precipitation). The second approach was based on the assessment of the Antecedent Precipitation Index (API), which determines the cumulative effect of precipitation on CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes.</p> <p>For the quantitative assessment of the relationship between temperature and precipitation extremes and flux anomalies, the percentages of days on which both the NEE/LE anomaly exceeded the standard deviation and the temperature/precipitation exceeded the 95th percentile for the upper threshold or the temperature did not reach the 5th percentile for the lower threshold were calculated. The percentage was calculated based on the total number of days when one of the characteristics (air temperature, daily sum of precipitation) exceeded the threshold.</p> <p>The analysis showed that temperate and polar wetland ecosystems can respond differently to temperature and precipitation anomalies. These differences can be attributed to the geographic location of the ecosystem, regional climatic conditions, plant species composition, and the intensity of temperature and precipitation extremes. During the warm half of the year, periods of extremely high temperatures in temperate latitudes were associated with a positive CO<sub>2</sub> flux anomaly, corresponding to an increased emission of CO<sub>2</sub> into the atmosphere. In contrast, polar latitudes showed an opposite response - an increase in CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by wetland ecosystems under anomalously high temperatures. This opposite response of CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes may be related to the different soil moisture regimes in polar wetland ecosystems and the different plant species composition. Extremely high temperatures were accompanied by positive LE anomalies due to the intensification of evaporation processes with rising temperatures, a trend observed in all wetland ecosystems analyzed.</p> <p>The immediate response of wetland ecosystems to intense precipitation (above the 95th percentile) was manifested as an increase in CO<sub>2</sub> flux to the atmosphere at almost all stations analyzed. This observed response could be related to the "Birch effect" [Birch, 1964], which is characterized by an intensification of soil respiration due to a sudden increase in soil moisture and, consequently, an increase in the rate of decomposition and mineralization of organic matter during heavy precipitation and rising groundwater levels. LE flux decreases during intense precipitation, indicating suppression of evaporation due to high humidity and reduced incoming solar radiation. The cumulative effect (API index) of extremely high precipitation is characterized by a predominance of extremely positive CO<sub>2</sub> flux anomalies over negative ones in wetland ecosystems at both temperate and polar latitudes. It should also be noted that the percentage of days with increased CO<sub>2 </sub>uptake during the two weeks following intense precipitation is significantly higher than for the immediate response (10-25% of days in temperate latitudes and 5-20% of days in polar latitudes). The increase in CO<sub>2</sub> uptake after heavy precipitation may be related to enhanced photosynthetic rates of the vegetation cover under sunny weather and optimal soil moisture conditions. A prolonged absence of precipitation, represented by extremely low API values, is accompanied by negative CO<sub>2</sub> flux anomalies (enhanced uptake) at most of the studied wetland ecosystem stations, indicating a high adaptive potential of the studied wetland ecosystems to short-term (less than 14 days) dry periods. On the other hand, enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> uptake could be facilitated by clear weather conditions, which prevail during dry periods and are accompanied by an increase in direct solar radiation and corresponding acceleration of photosynthetic processes.</p> <p>It is noteworthy that flux anomalies often did not coincide with temperature or precipitation extremes, indicating that the functioning of wetland ecosystems is strongly influenced by multiple abiotic and biotic factors, which vary among different plant communities.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В рамках данного исследования проведена оценка возможных отличий в отклике болотных экосистем умеренных и полярных широт, расположенных на различных континентах, на экстремальные явления погоды (аномально высокие/низкие температуры, засухи/интенсивные осадки и др.). Влияние экстремальных явлений погоды на изменчивость потоков СО<sub>2</sub> и скрытого тепла (LE) в различных болотных экосистемах оценивалось с помощью метеорологических данных реанализа ERA5, а также данных о потоках СО<sub>2</sub> и LE c 15 станций мониторинга потоков парниковых газов из глобальной сети FLUXNET. Анализ реакции потоков СО<sub>2</sub> и LE на экстремальные температуры и осадки показал, что отклик болотных экосистем в умеренных и полярных широтах может различаться в зависимости от географического положения, региональных климатических условий, структуры растительного покрова, а также от интенсивности аномалий температуры и осадков. Если в умеренных широтах в течение теплого периода во время экстремально высоких температур наблюдалась преобладающая положительная аномалия потока CO<sub>2</sub> (превышение эмиссии над поглощением СО<sub>2</sub>), то в полярных широтах отмечался противоположный отклик – увеличение нетто поглощения СО<sub>2</sub> болотными экосистемами. Мгновенный отклик на интенсивные осадки во всех рассматриваемых болотных экосистемах был идентичным и проявлялся в виде усиления эмиссии (положительной аномалии) СО<sub>2</sub> в атмосферу. Экстремально высокие значения температуры сопровождались положительными аномалиями LE из-за интенсификации процессов испарения с повышением температуры. Подобный эффект наблюдался во всех исследуемых болотных экосистемах. Кумулятивный эффект от экстремально высоких осадков характеризуется преобладанием эмиссии CO<sub>2</sub> над поглощением как в болотных экосистемах умеренных широт, так и в отдельных экосистемах, расположенных в полярных широтах. Отсутствие осадков на протяжении нескольких недель сильно не сказывалось на потоках СО<sub>2</sub> и сопровождалось для большинства исследуемых болотных экосистем доминирующими отрицательными аномалиями потока СО<sub>2</sub> (усиление поглощения СО<sub>2</sub>).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>permanent wetlands</kwd><kwd>temperature and precipitation anomalies</kwd><kwd>Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) of CO2</kwd><kwd>latent heat flux</kwd><kwd>FLUXNET database</kwd><kwd>reanalysis</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>болотные экосистемы</kwd><kwd>аномалии температуры и осадков</kwd><kwd>потоки углекислого газа</kwd><kwd>реанализ</kwd><kwd>база данных FLUXNET</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">Russian Science Foundation (project) № 22–17–00073</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Российский научный фонд (проект) № 22–17–00073</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Anjileli H., Huning L.S., Moftakhari H., Ashraf S., Asanjan A.A., Norouzi H., AghaKouchak A. 2021. Extreme heat events heighten soil respiration. Scientific Reports., 11(1): 6632. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85764-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Aubinet M., Vesala T., Papale D. Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; p. 438. ISBN 9789400723504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Belward A.S., Estes J., Kline K. et al. 1999. The IGBP-DIS global 1-km land-cover data set DIS-Cover: A project overview. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65(9): 1013-1020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Birch H.F. 1964. Mineralisation of plant nitrogen following alternate wet and dry conditions. Plant Soil, 20, 43-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Charrier G. Martin-StPaul N., Damesin C., Delpierre N., Hänninen H., Torres-Ruiz J.M., Davi H. 2021. Interaction of drought and frost in tree ecophysiology: rethinking the timing of risks. Annals of Forest Science. 78(2): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-021-01052-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Ciais P., Reichstein M., Viovy N. et al. 2005. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature. 437(7058): 529-533. DOI: 10.1038/nature03972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Dinsmore K.J., Billett M.F., Dyson K.E. 2013. Temperature and precipitation drive temporal variability in aquatic carbon and GHG concentrations and fluxes in a peatland catchment. Global change biology, 19(7): 2133-2148. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12209.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020; P. 11-23. DOI: 10.4060/ca9825en.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Frank D., Reichstein M., Bahn M., Thonicke K., Frank D., Mahecha M.D., Smith P., van der Velde M., Vicca S., Babst F. et al. 2015. Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: Concepts, processes and potential future impacts. Glob. Chang. Biol., 21: 2861-2880. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12916.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Fratini G., Mauder M. 2014. Towards a consistent eddy-covariance processing: an intercomparison of EddyPro and TK3. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 7(7): 2273-2281. DOI: 10.5194/amt-7-2273-2014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Gill A.L., Giasson M.A., Yu, R., &amp; Finzi A.C. 2017. Deep peat warming increases surface methane and carbon dioxide emissions in a black spruce‐dominated ombrotrophic bog. Global change biology, 23(12): 5398-5411. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13806.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Gushchina D., Tarasova M., Satosina E. et al. 2023. The Response of Daily Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor Fluxes to Temperature and Precipitation Extremes in Temperate and Boreal Forests, Climate, 11(10): 206. DOI: 10.3390/cli11100206.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Kramer R.D., Ishii H.R., Carter K.R., Miyazaki Y., Cavaleri M.A., Araki M.G., Azuma W.A., Inoue Y., Hara C. 2020. Predicting effects of climate change on productivity and persistence of forest trees. Ecol. Res., 35: 562-574. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1703.12127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Li X., Wei Y., Li F. 2021. Optimality of antecedent precipitation index and its application. Journal of Hydrology, 595: 126027. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126027.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Mamkin V., Avilov V., Ivanov D., Varlagin A., &amp; Kurbatova J. 2023. Interannual variability in the ecosystem CO2 fluxes at a paludified spruce forest and ombrotrophic bog in the southern taiga. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23(3), 2273-2291. DOI: 10.5194/acp-23-2273-2023.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Manzoni S., Chakrawal A., Fischer T., Schimel J.P., Porporato A., Vico G. 2020. Rainfall intensification increases the contribution of rewetting pulses to soil heterotrophic respiration. Biogeosciences. 17(15): 4007-4023. DOI: 10.5194/bg-17-4007-2020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Oechel W., Hastings S., Vourlrtis G. et al. 1993. Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source. Nature 361: 520-523. DOI: 10.1038/361520a0.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Park S.B., Knohl A., Migliavacca M., Thum T., Vesala T., Peltola O., Mammarella I., Prokushkin A., Kolle O., Lavrič J., Park S.S. and Heimann M. 2021. Temperature Control of Spring CO2 Fluxes at a Coniferous Forest and a Peat Bog in Central Siberia, Atmosphere, 12: 984, DOI: 10.3390/atmos12080984.  </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Post E., Forchhammer M.C., Bret-Harte M.S. et al. 2009. Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science, 325(5946): 1355-1358. DOI: 10.1126/science.1173113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Reichstein M., Falge E., Baldocchi D., Papale D., Aubinet M., Berbigier P., Bernhofer C., Buchmann N., Gilmanov T., Granier A. et al. 2005 On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: Review and improved algorithm. Glob. Chang. Biol., 11: 1424-1439. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Ritter F., Berkelhammer M., Garcia-Eidell C. 2020. Distinct response of gross primary productivity in five terrestrial biomes to precipitation variability. Commun. Earth Environ. 1(1): 34 DOI: 10.1038/s43247-020-00034-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Scharlemann J.P., Tanner E.V., Hiederer R., Kapos V. 2014. Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Management, 5(1): 81-91. DOI: 10.4155/cmt.13.77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Sirin A., Laine J. 2008. Peatlands and greenhouse gases, in: Assessment on peatlands, biodiversity and climate change, main report / Parish F., Sirin А., Charman D. et al. (eds.). Wageningen, Global Environment Centre, Kuala Lumpur and Wetlands International, pp. 118-138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Smith M.D. 2011. An ecological perspective on extreme climatic events: A synthetic definition and framework to guide future research. J. Ecol. 99: 656-663. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01798.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>The Changing State of the Climate. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P. et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 287-422; ISBN 9781009157896.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>The Data Portal serving the FLUXNET community. [Электронный ресурс]: https://fluxnet.org/data/, свободный. – Загл. с экрана.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Ummenhofer C.C., Meeh I.G.A. 2017. Extreme weather and climate events with ecological relevance: A review. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 372: 20160135. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0135.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Wutzler T., Lucas-Moffat A., Migliavacca M., Knauer J., Sickel K., Šigut L., Menzer O., Reichstein M. 2018. Basic and extensible post-processing of eddy covariance flux data with REddyProc. Biogeosciences, 15: 5015-5030. DOI: 10.5194/bg-15-5015-2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Xu J., Morris P.J., Liu J., &amp; Holden J. 2018. PEATMAP: Refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis. Catena, 160: 134-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang Z. Ju, W., Zhou Y., &amp; Li X. 2022 Revisiting the cumulative effects of drought on global gross primary productivity based on new long‐term series data (1982-2018). Global Change Biology, 28(11): 3620-3635. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16178.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Zheleznova I.V., Gushchina D.Y. 2023. Variability of extreme air temperatures and precipitation in different natural zones in late XX and early XXI centuries according to ERA5 reanalysis data. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 2023, 59: 479-488. DOI: 10.31857/S0002351523050139 (in Russian) [Железнова И.В., Гущина Д.Ю. Изменчивость экстремальных температур воздуха и осадков в конце XX и начале XXI века в различных природных зонах по данным реанализа ERA5 // Известия РАН. Физика Атмосферы и Океана. 2023. Т. 59. С. 479-488. DOI: 10.31857/S0002351523050139].</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
