Primary sanitary and hygienic assessment of microorganisms used in biotechnology

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. The use of microorganisms in biotechnological enterprises, agriculture, and forestry can be accompanied by microbial contamination of the environment and have an adverse effect on the human health.

The purpose of the research is to develop and put into practice quantitative criteria for the pathogenicity of biotechnological microorganisms as the first stage in assessing their safety.

Materials and methods. Lethal dose (LD50) and “threshold” (Limbact) doses, dissemination in internal organs, toxigenicity, and “pathogenicity enzymes” of thirty-three strains of saprophytic, opportunistic and pathogenic bacteria, 250 strains of 10 genera proposed for use in biotechnology, and 11 strains already used as active biopreparation substances were investigated.

Results. Based on the criteria for primary sanitary and hygienic assessment, microorganisms were selected into three groups: strains recommended for industrial use; strains at risk of application; strains not recommended for use. Among the studied 250 strains of microorganisms proposed for use in biotechnology, 38.9% did not have pathogenic properties and can be used, 41.0% are conditionally pathogenic and are at risk of use, and 20.1% are not recommended for use in biotechnology due to the presence of pathogenic properties. A study of the pathogenic properties of 11 strains of bacteria that are the part of modern biological products showed that they belong to non-pathogenic microorganisms.

Limitations. The development and testing of the criteria for the primary sanitary and hygienic assessment of microorganisms proposed for biotechnology were carried out on a large material (more than 250 strains) with a single exposure to high doses, which did not allow us to assess the specific effects of exposure to strains during long-term exposure and may be the subject of further research.

Conclusion. The criteria for the primary sanitary and hygienic assessment of microorganisms proposed for use in biotechnologies include average lethal and “threshold” doses dissemination in internal organs, toxigenicity and activity of “pathogenicity enzymes”. All planned for use in biotechnology microorganisms should be examined for possible pathogenic properties. Biological products used in real time in the national economy contain only saprophytic microorganisms as an active substance. The problem of biosafety should be solved in the direction of studying the specific effect of microorganisms and biological products on the immune system influence and the state of the microcenosis of the body.

Compliance with ethical standards. The conducted study does not require a conclusion on biomedical ethics since it is a generalization of many years of work of researchers on this issue.

Contribution:
Korolik V.V., Sheina N.I. — concept and design of the study, statistical analysis, writing text, editing;
Mjalina L.I. — сollection and processing of material;
Sazonova L.P. — сollection of material;
Drugova E.D. — material processing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: May 29, 2022 / Accepted: December 8, 2022 / Published: March 25, 2023

About the authors

Victor V. Korolik

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: korolikvv52@gmail.com

MD, PhD, DSci, Professor, professor of hygiene department of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation.

e-mail: korolikvv52@gmail.com

Russian Federation

Natalia I. Sheina

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2314-183X
Russian Federation

Lyubov I. Mjalina

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8136-8549
Russian Federation

Lyubov P. Sazonova

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9312-996X
Russian Federation

Elena D. Drugova

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4721-0518
Russian Federation

References

  1. González D., Probanza M.A., Jiménez P.A. Selection of mercury-resistant PGPR strains using the BMRSI for bioremediation purposes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18(18): 9867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189867
  2. Mitra S., Das A., Sen S., Mahanty B. Potential of metabolic engineering in bacterial nanosilver synthesis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018; 34(9): 138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2522-8
  3. Voulgaridou G.P., Mantso T., Anestopoulos I., Klavaris A., Katzastra C., Kiousi D.E., et al. Toxicity profiling of biosurfactants produced by novel marine bacterial strains. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021; 22(5): 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052383
  4. Khan M.A., Hamayun M., Asaf S., Khan M., Yun B.W., Kang S.M., et al. Rhizospheric Bacillus spp. rescues plant growth under salinity stress via regulating gene expression, endogenous hormones, and antioxidant system of Oryza sativa L. Front. Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 665590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.665590
  5. Donohue D.C. Safety of probiotics. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006; 15(4): 563–9.
  6. Vesterlund S., Vankerckhoven V., Saxelin M., Goossens H., Salminen S., Ouwehand A.C. Safety assessment of Lactobacillus strains: presence of putative risk factors in faecal, blood and probiotic isolates. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007; 116(3): 325–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.002
  7. Bernardeau M., Vernoux J.P., Henri-Dubernet S., Guéguen M. Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: the Lactobacillus genus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008; 126(3): 278–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.08.015
  8. Stavropoulou E., Emonet S. Probiotics: benefits and harms. Rev. Med. Suisse. 2020; 16(710): 1916–9. (in French)
  9. Chirkina T.M., Makhon’ko M.N., Shkrobova N.V. Diseases caused by exposure to antibiotics in modern industrial conditions. Byulleten’ meditsinskikh internet-konferentsiy. 2013; 3(11): 1161–3. (in Russian)
  10. Shevlyakov V.V., Filonyuk V.A., Rybina T.N., Chernyshova E.V., Kardash O.F., Erm G.I., et al. The state of health of workers in biotechnological productions. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2014; 13(3): 127–38. (in Russian)
  11. Dmitrieva L.B., Laver B.I., Rodionova O.M. Comparative estimation of vaginal candidosis frequency among women working in pharmaceutical medicines and antibiotics industry. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Ekologiya i bezopasnost’ zhiznedeyatel’nosti. 2004; (1): 141–4. (in Russian)
  12. Kataeva L.V., Stepanova T.F., Posoyuznykh O.V., Tashlanova V.V., Karpukhina N.F., Kolotova O.N., et al. On the issue of the spread of Aeromonas bacteria in the environment and clinical material. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2018; (6): 54–7. (in Russian)
  13. Egorova O.N., Brusina E.B., Grigor’ev E.V. Epidemiology and prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: Federal clinical guidelines. Moscow; 2014. (in Russian)
  14. Korolik V.V. Comprehensive hygienic assessment of biotechnological strains of microorganisms, in connection with their environmental pollution: Diss. Moscow; 1999. (in Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Korolik V.V., Sheina N.I., Mjalina L.I., Sazonova L.P., Drugova E.D.



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.