Main results, prospects of application and improvement of the health risk assessment of the population of Siberian cities – participants of the “Clean air” project (Bratsk, Norilsk, Krasnoyarsk, Chita)
- Authors: Zaitseva N.V.1, May I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
- Issue: Vol 100, No 5 (2021)
- Pages: 519-527
- Section: HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
- Published: 07.06.2021
- URL: https://edgccjournal.org/0016-9900/article/view/639306
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-5-519-527
- ID: 639306
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. As part of implementing the federal project “Clean air” provisions, the Human health risk assessment in Bratsk, Norilsk, Krasnoyarsk, Chita under the influence of ambient air-polluting chemicals was carried out. The main task of the risk assessment was to substantiate the list of priority chemicals that make the most significant contribution to risks (for monitoring and quoting) and to determine the primary sources of air pollution in the city with these substances (for subsequent quotas).
Materials and methods. The initial information for assessing the exposure and human health risks in each city was the consolidated databases of stationary and mobile emissions sources. Calculations were carried out in standardized software products of the “Ecolog-Gorod” series. Risk indicators were determined under the provisions and requirements of the guideline R 2.1.10.1920-04. In each city, the calculations were performed at residential buildings (from 11 to 14 thousand points in the territory). Emissions from more than 1350 thousand sources were taken into account. Surface concentrations of 45 to 60 impurities in each city are considered.
Results. Unacceptable, including high health risk, was found to form in all the cities studied. According to the hazard index, the diversity of exceeding the permissible risk levels reached 15-20 times. About 630 thousand people live in areas of unacceptable risk, including more than 200 thousand people in areas of high risk of diseases. Critical affected organs and systems are the respiratory systems, immune system, blood, offspring development, etc. The chemical impurities determined for each territory and their sources, which together contribute up to 90% to unacceptable risks, are considered as priorities for monitoring and quotas. Recommendations were developed to improve the procedure for preparing initial data for risk assessment and verify the results of risk assessment by epidemiological and medical-demographic studies.
Keywords
About the authors
Nina V. Zaitseva
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Author for correspondence.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2356-1145
Russian Federation
Irina V. May
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Email: may@fcrisk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0976-7016
MD, Ph.D., D Sci., Professor, Deputy Director for research work of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation.
e-mail: may@fcrisk.ru
Russian FederationReferences
- Popova A.Yu. Strategic priorities of the Russian Federation in the field of ecology from the position of preservation of health of the nation. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2014; (2): 4–7. (in Russian)
- Popova A.Yu., Zaytseva N.V., May I.V. Population health as a target function and criterion for assessing efficiency of activities performed within “Pure air” federal project. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2019; (4): 4–13. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2019.4.01.eng
- WHO. Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks; 2016. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565196
- Revich B.A. National project «Clean Air» in the context of public health protection. Ekologicheskiy vestnik Rossii. Available at: http://ecovestnik.ru/index.php/2013-07-07-02-13-50/nashi-publikacii/3132-natsionalnyj-proekt-chistyj-vozdukh-v-kontekste-okhrany-zdorovya-naseleniya (in Russian)
- Zakharov V.M., Bobylev S.N., eds. Economic Consequences of the Impact of a Polluted Environment on Public Health: a Guide to Regional Environmental Policy [Ekonomicheskie posledstviya vozdeystviya zagryaznennoy okruzhayushchey sredy na zdorov’e naseleniya: posobie po regional’noy ekologicheskoy politike]. Moscow: Akropol’; 2007. (in Russian)
- Ryzhakov S.A., Zaytseva N.V., May I.V., Alekseev V.B., Podluzhnaya M.Ya., Kir’yanov D.A. Macroeconomic analysis of health loss probably caused by emission of pollutants into atmospheric air. Permskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2009; 26(3): 139–43. (in Russian)
- Wolf J., Corvalan C., Neville T., Bos R., Neira M. Diseases due to unhealthy environmental: as updated estimate of the global burden of diseases attributable to environmental determinants of health. J. Public Health (Oxf.) 2017; 39(3): 464–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw085
- Malonog K.P. To the question on economic criteria of the evaluation of risk for health of the population from contamination of atmospheric air. Aktual’nye problemy transportnoy meditsiny. 2006; (3): 122–6. (in Russian)
- Kukkonen J., Savolahti M., Palamarchuk Y., Tiittanen P., Karvosenoja N. Modelling of the public health costs of fine particulate matter and results for Finland in 2015. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020; 20(15): 9371–91.
- Bobylev S.N. Sustainable development for future generations: economic priorities. Mir novoy ekonomiki. 2017; (3): 90–6. (in Russian)
- Vakula M.A. Legal protection of atmospheric air in the context of sustainable development and public health: Russia and the world experience. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020; 467(1): 0121264.
- Rakitskiy V.N., Avaliani S.L., Novikov S.M., Shashina T.A., Dodina N.S., Kislitsin V.A. Health risk analysis related to exposure to ambuent air contamination as a component in the strategy aimed at reducing global non-infectious epidemics. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2019; (4): 30–4. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2019.4.03.eng
- Timofeeva S.S., Timofeev S.S. Ecological problems of Irkutsk from the point of view of students of the Irkutsk National Technical University. In: Zvyagintsev V.V., eds. Technosphere Safety of the Baikal Region. Collection of Articles of the International Scientific and Practical Conference [Sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Tekhnosfernaya bezopasnost’ baykal’skogo regiona»]. Chita; 2017: 108–15. (in Russian).
- Lebedeva-Nesevrya N.A., Leukhina A.V. Satisfaction of the population with the state of the environment as a key indicator of the national project «Ecology». In: Popova A.Yu., Zaytseva N.V., ed. Health Risk Analysis-2020 together with the International meeting on Environment and Health Rise-2020 and the Round Table on Food Safety: Proceedings of the X All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation [Analiz riska zdorov’yu – 2020 sovmestno s mezhdunarodnoy vstrechey po okruzhayushchey srede i zdorov’yu Rise-2020 i kruglym stolom po bezopasnosti pitaniya: materialy X Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem]. Perm’; 2020: 296–300. (in Russian)
- Polichetti G., Cocco S., Spinali A., Trimarco V., Nunziata A. Effects of particulate matter (PM 10, PM 2.5 and PM 1) on the cardiovascular system. Toxicology. 2009; 261(1–2): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.04.035
- Putaud J.P. A European aerosol phenomenology – 3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe. Atmos. Environ. 2010; 44(10): 1308–20.
- Sarovar V., Malig B.J., Basu R. A case-crossover study of short-term air pollution exposure and the risk of stillbirth in California, 1999–2009. Environ. Res. 2020; 191: 110103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110103
- Solomin V.A., Shabanov A.V., Shabanov A.A., Kilyushnik V.M., Mladenskiy A.V. Analysis of methods and means of ecological control of harmful emissions of exhaust gases of automobiles. Izvestiya MGTU MAMI. 2016; (4): 82–9. (in Russian)
- Pichugin Yu.A. Environmental quality monitoring and multidimensional statistical analysis. Astrakhanskiy vestnik ekologicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2012; (2): 101–5. (in Russian)
- Zaytseva N.V., Shur P.Z., Chetverkina K.V., Khasanova A.A. Developing methodical approaches to substantiating average annual maximum permissible concentrations of hazardous substances in ambient air in settlements as per acceptable health risk. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2020; (3): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2020.3.05.eng
- Brunekreef B. Environmental epidemiology and risk assessment. Toxicol. Lett. 2008; 180(2): 118–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.012
- Zemlyanova M.A., Zaytseva N.V., Tikhonova I.V. Assessment of the informativeness of indicators of potential risk and actually caused harm to health in conditions of negative effects of a chemical factor. In: Popova A.Yu., Zaytseva N.V., ed. Health Risk Analysis-2020 together with the International meeting on Environment and Health Rise-2020 and the Round Table on Food Safety: Proceedings of the X All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation [Analiz riska zdorov’yu – 2020 sovmestno s mezhdunarodnoy vstrechey po okruzhayushchey srede i zdorov’yu Rise-2020 i kruglym stolom po bezopasnosti pitaniya: materialy X Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem]. Perm’; 2020: 123–129 (in Russian).
- Identifying the environmental cause of disease: how should we decide what to believe and when to take action? London: Academy of Medical Sciences; 2007. Available at: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/34586-A5WebRea.pdf
Supplementary files
