Chemical and analytical support for the safe use of the fungicide pidiflumetofen in agricultural practice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Introduction. The launch of chemical compositions based on pydiflumetofen, which has already proven itself in global agricultural practice as an effective means of suppressing mycotoxin-producing fungi, on the Russian market has set the task of chemical and analytical support for its safe use.

The aim of the study was to develop methods for determining residual amounts of pydiflumetofen in plant products and environmental objects (water, soil, air), which would be available for wide implementation in analytical laboratories, with subsequent use to assess the safety of pesticide application technology on grain crops.

Materials and methods. High-performance liquid chromatography with a diode array detector was used for measurements. The sample preparation was based on the classical scheme, which consists of extracting the substance from plant samples and soil with a mixture of acetonitrile and water, followed by purification of the extract using solid-phase extraction (SPE). Concentration of the water sample with its simultaneous purification was performed on SPE cartridges. Sampling of air from the working area was performed using paper filters, and atmospheric air was sampled using XAD-2 sorption tubes.

Results. The optimal conditions for the chromatographic separation of pydiflumetofen were selected: a column with a reversed phase (C18), the mobile phase is acetonitrile: water (75:25, by volume), the mode is isocratic, the wavelength is 230 nm. Absolute calibration on a solvent was used. The calibration characteristic is linear in the concentration range of 0.05–0.1 µg/ml, the correlation coefficient is more than 0.99. The lower limit of the detectable concentrations (in grain and soil 0.01 mg/kg, straw – 0.05 mg/kg, water – 0.001 mg/L, air of the working area – 0.01 mg/m3, atmospheric air – 0.005 mg/m3) corresponds to the established hygienic standards.

Limitations. In the study, only cereal grains (wheat, barley) were considered as plant products.

Conclusion. The developed methods were used to assess the safety of the pesticide application technology on grain crops. No residual amounts of the active substance were detected in the elements of the crop (grain, straw) of winter wheat and spring barley over a two-year observation period. Laboratory studies have confirmed the substance to be retained in the upper layers of soil, which limits its penetration into groundwater. The results of the hygienic assessment of the technology of ground spraying of field crops showed the risk to workers to be acceptable.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require a biomedical ethics committee opinion.

Contribution:
Rakitskiy V.N. — concept and design of the study;
Bragina I.V. — concept and design of the study;
Bondareva L.G
. — collection and processing of material, writing the text, editing;
Fedorova N.E. — concept and design of the study, collection and processing of material, writing the text, editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: November 4, 2024 / Accepted: December 3, 2024 / Published: December 28, 2024

About the authors

Valery N. Rakitskiy

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: vtox@yandex.ru

DSc (Medicine), Academician of the RAS, Scientific Director of the Institute of Hygiene, Pesticide Toxicology and Chemical Safety, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: vtox@yandex.ru

Irina V. Bragina

Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare

Email: bragina_IV@gsen.ru

DSc (Medicine), Deputy Head of the Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Man Wellbeing, Moscow, 117105, Russian Federation

e-mail: bragina_IV@gsen.ru

Lydia G. Bondareva

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: lydiabondareva@gmail.com

PhD (Chemistry), Senior researcher, Department of an analytical control methods, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: lydiabondareva@gmail.com

Nataliia E. Fedorova

Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Author for correspondence.
Email: analyt1@yandex.ru

DSc (Biology), Chief Researcher, Department of an analytical control methods, Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Mytishchi, 141014, Russian Federation

e-mail: analyt1@yandex.ru

References

  1. Thambugala K.M., Daranagama D.A., Phillips A.J.L., Kannangara S.D., Promputtha I. Fungi vs. fungi in biocontrol: an overview of fungal antagonists applied against fungal plant pathogens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020; 10: 604923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.604923
  2. Islam T., Haque M.A., Barai H.R., Istiaq A., Kim J.J. Antibiotic resistance in plant pathogenic bacteria: recent data and environmental impact of unchecked use and the potential of biocontrol agents as an eco-friendly alternative. Plants. 2024; 13(8): 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13081135
  3. Hui S.T., Gifford H., Rhodes J. Emerging antifungal resistance in fungal pathogens. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2024; 11(2): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-024-00219-8
  4. World Mycotoxin Survey. The Global Threat; 2024. Available at: https://feedplanetmagazine.com/blog/dsm-publishes-results-of-annual-mycotoxin-survey-1710
  5. Glynn N.C., Hare M.C., Parry D.W., Edwards S.G. Phylogenetic analysis of EF-1 alpha gene sequences from isolates of Microdochium nivale leads to elevation of varieties majus and nivale to species status. Mycol. Res. 2005; 109(Pt. 8): 872–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756205003370
  6. Parry D.W., Jenkinson P., McLeod L. Fusarium Ear Blight (Scab) in Small-Grain Cereals – A Review. Plant. Pathol. 1995; 44(2): 207–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02773
  7. Leonard K.J., Bushnell W.R. Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat and Barley. St. Paul, MN: The American Phytopathological Society; 2003.
  8. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pydiflumetofen. EFSA J. 2024; 22(1): e8559. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8559
  9. Bian C., Luo J., Gao M., Shi X., Li Y., Li B., et al. Pydiflumetofen in paddy field environments: its dissipation dynamics and dietary risk. Microchem. J. 2021; 170(4): 106709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.106709
  10. Wu Q., Chen H., Li D., Zhang W., Yang H., Zhuang Y. Degradation dynamics and residue analysis of pydiflumetofen in wheat by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Plant. Prot. 2021; 47: 164–8. https://doi.org/10.16688/j.zwbh.2019716
  11. Liu S., Wang Z., Li C., Wang Y., Zhong J., Shi H., et al. Determination of pydiflumetofen in seven kinds of plant-derived foods based on QuEChERS – liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Agrochemicals. 2021; 60: 500–3. https://doi.org/10.16820/j.cnki.1006-0413.2021.07.008
  12. Zhang F., Zhang Y., Yue Y., Han B. Residue analysis and dietary risk assessment of pydiflumetofen and difenoconazole in banana. Chin. J. Trop. Crops. 2021; 42: 1448–54. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.05.034
  13. Rong L., Wu X., Xu J., Dong F., Liu X., Zheng Y. Determination of pydiflumetofen residues in some foods of plant and animal origin by QuEChERS extraction combined with ultra performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass. Food Anal. Methods. 2018; 11(7): 2682–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-018-1178-1
  14. Kong S., Kong X., Zhang Y., Wu W., Tian F., Kong D., et al. Determination of the residual pydiflumetofen in soil. Chin. J. Anal. Lab. 2019; 38: 1228–32. https://doi.org/10.13595/j.cnki.issn1000-0720.2018.102907
  15. Wu X., Dong F., Xu J., Liu X., Wu X., Zheng Y. Enantioselective separation and dissipation of pydiflumetofen enantiomers in grape and soil by supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2020; 43(11): 2217–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201901332
  16. Wang Z., Liu S., Zhao X., Tian B., Sun X., Zhang J., et al. Enantioseparation and stereoselective dissipation of the novel chiral fungicide pydiflumetofen by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021; 207: 111221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111221
  17. PPDB. Pesticide Properties Date Base. Available at: https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/Reports/3086.htm
  18. Kuzovkova A., Ivashkevich L. Determination method of the new fungicide pydiflumetofen in water. In: «Sakharov readings 2019: Environmental problems of the 21st century». Proceedings of the International conference, Volume 3 [«Sakharovskie chteniya 2019 goda: Ekologicheskie problemy XXI veka». Materialy 19-i mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, tom 3]. Minsk; 2019: 54–7. https://elibrary.ru/uoyetk (in Russian)
  19. Farha W., Abd El-Aty A.M., Rahman M.M., Shin H.C., Shim J.H. An overview on common aspects influencing the dissipation pattern of pesticides: a review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016; 188(12): 693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5709-1
  20. Delcour I., Spanoghe P., Uyttendaele M. Literature review: Impact of climate change on pesticide use. Food Res. Int. 2015; 68: 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.09.030
  21. Yang X.B., Ying G.G., Peng P.A., Wang L.I., Zhao J.L., Zhang L.J., et al. Influence of biochars on plant uptake and dissipation of two pesticides in an agricultural soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010; 58(13): 7915–21. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf1011352
  22. Krupenko N. Physical-chemical properties of fungicides applied for protection of cereals against diseases in Belarus. Vestnik zashchity rastenii. 2023; 106(2): 93–9. https://doi.org/10.31993/2308-6459-2023-106-2-15781 (in Russian)
  23. Liu Q., Liu Y., Dong F., Sallach J.B., Wu X., Liu X., et al. Uptake kinetics and accumulation of pesticides in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Impact of chemical and plant properties. Environ. Pollut. 2021; 275: 116637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116637
  24. Shi X., Xie G., Zhang W. Assessment of the hydrolysis of pydiflumetofen and its degradation characteristics in agricultural soils. Molecules. 2023; 28(11): 4282. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114282

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.