Integration of methodologies for the sanitation and treatment of wastewater contaminated by pharmaceuticals

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Introduction. The research aims to analyse the present physical, chemical, and combined methods and practices used to extract pharmaceuticals (PC) from wastewater (WW) starting from different sources, such as municipal waste and hospital release, emphasizing PC manufacturing companies. PC contaminants are primarily persistent organic chemicals not readily eliminated by standard WW treatment (WWT) procedures.Materials and methods. The research examined suggests that enhanced oxidation methods can destroy these persistent medicines. The oxidation introduces harmful oxidation products if these procedures are not carefully controlled. Physical processes, including adsorption of carbon and membrane filtering, can give an obstacle that inhibits both parent substances and harmful products from flowing into treated effluent.Results. A combination of multiple procedures can be an appropriate treatment plan for the persistence and degrading of both parent and conversion chemicals. The benefits of the procedures are integrated through combined technology, resulting in a maximization of pollutant cancellation. Sophisticated oxidation manipulation, either pre-treatment or post-treatment, paired with a natural adsorption or filtering method, is a promising approach.Limitations. However, the best procedures for PCs-containing WW depend on the quality and amount of WW, the PC compound leftovers, and their dangerous consequences.Conclusion. This research underscores the importance of combining enhanced oxidation methods with physical processes like adsorption and membrane filtration to effectively extract PC from WW. While these integrated approaches show promise in degrading contaminants, their success depends on the specific characteristics of the WW and the PC present. Continued exploration and refinement of these methods are essential for addressing PC pollution comprehensively. Future studies should focus on optimizing these strategies across varied WW contexts.Compliance with Ethical Standards. The research adheres to ethical guidelines as set forth by the relevant authorities. All procedures involving human or animal subjects were approved by the appropriate ethics committee, and all necessary consent forms were obtained.Contribution: Dewangan H. — designed and conducted the research, performed the data analysis, and wrote the manuscript; Dewangan T. — contributed to the methodology and helped with data interpretation. All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.Conflict of Interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.Acknowledgment. The authors would like to thank Kalinga University for providing the resources and facilities necessary for conducting this research.Received: October 22, 2024 / Revised: November 15, 2024 / Accepted: December 3, 2024 / Published: April 30, 2025

参考

  1. Taoufik N., Boumya W., Janani F.Z., Elhalil A., Mahjoubi F.Z. Removal of emerging pharmaceutical pollutants: a systematic mapping study review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020; 8(5): 104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104251
  2. Koul B., Sharma K., Shah M.P. Phytoremediation: A sustainable alternative in wastewater treatment (WWT) regime. Environ. Technol. Inno. 2022; 25: 102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.102040
  3. Koul B., Yadav D., Singh S., Kumar M., Song M. Insights into the domestic wastewater treatment (DWWT) regimes: a review. Water. 2022; 14(21): 3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213542
  4. Jia C., Lu P., Zhang M. Preparation and characterization of environmentally friendly controlled release fertilizers coated by leftovers-based polymer. Processes. 2020; 8(4): 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8040417
  5. Šimatović A., Udiković-Kolić N. Antibiotic resistance in pharmaceutical industry effluents and effluent-impacted environments. In: Manaia C., Donner E., Vaz-Moreira I., Hong P., eds. Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Volume 91. Cham: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2019_389
  6. Buaisha M., Balku S., Özalp-Yaman S. Heavy metal removal investigation in conventional activated sludge systems. Civ. Eng. J. 2020; 6(3): 470–7. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091484
  7. Mor S., Ravindra K. Municipal solid waste landfills in lower-and middle-income countries: Environmental impacts, challenges, and sustainable management practices. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2023; 174: 510–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.04.014
  8. Shetty S.S., Deepthi D., Harshitha S., Sonkusare S., Naik P.B., Kumari N.S., et al. Environmental pollutants and their effects on human health. Heliyon. 2023; 9(9): e19496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19496
  9. Ahmad A., Abbas M., Miregwa B., Holbrook A.M. Variability in prescription medication coverage for children and youth across Canada: A scoping review. Health Policy. 2022; 126(3): 269–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.012
  10. Sungur Ş. Pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment: occurrence and impact on the functioning of the ecosystem. In: Emerging Contaminants in the Environment. Elsevier; 2022: 137–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85160-2.00009-3
  11. Kasimanickam V., Kasimanickam M., Kasimanickam R. Antibiotics use in food animal production: escalation of antimicrobial resistance: where are we now in combating AMR? Med. Sci. (Basel). 2021; 9(1): 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci9010014
  12. Conde-Cid M., Núñez-Delgado A., Fernández-Sanjurjo M.J., Álvarez-Rodríguez E., Fernández-Calviño D., Arias-Estévez M. Tetracycline and sulfonamide antibiotics in soils: presence, fate, and environmental risks. Processes. 2020; 8(11): 1479.
  13. Gwenzi W., Kanda A., Danha C., Muisa‐Zikali N., Chaukura N. Occurrence, human health risks, and removal of pharmaceuticals in aqueous systems: Current knowledge and future perspectives. In: Applied Water Science. Volume 1: Fundamentals and Applications. Scrivener; 2021: 63–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119725237.ch2
  14. Smith J.P., Boyd T.J., Cragan J., Ward M.C. Dissolved rubidium to strontium ratio as a conservative tracer for wastewater effluent-sourced contaminant inputs near a major urban wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 2021; 205: 117691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117691
  15. Eze E.M., Obiebi P.O., Okpoghono J., Aruorem O., Etaware P.M., Ukolobi O., et al. Occurrence and fate of pharmaceutical and cosmetic wastes on plankton consortia. In: Anani O.A., Shah M.P., eds. Emergent Pollutants in Freshwater Plankton Communities. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2024: 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003362975
  16. Pandis P.K., Kalogirou C., Kanellou E., Vaitsis C., Savvidou M.G., Sourkouni G., et al. Key points of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for wastewater, organic pollutants, and pharmaceutical waste treatment: A mini-review. ChemEngineering. 2022; 6(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering6010008
  17. Anusha B., Anbuchezhiyan M., Sribalan R., Srinivasan alias Arunsankar N. Synergistic effect of TiO2-rGO nanocomposites with Fenton’s reagent for the enhanced photocatalytic degradation of nitrophenols in solar light. Appl. Phys. A. 2022; 128(5): 411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-05554-5
  18. Lim S., Shi J.L., von Gunten U., McCurry D.L. Ozonation of organic compounds in water and wastewater: A critical review. Water Res. 2022; 213: 118053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118053
  19. Khan M.E., Mohammad A., Yoon T. State-of-the-art developments in carbon quantum dots (CQDs): Photo-catalysis, bio-imaging, and bio-sensing applications. Chemosphere. 2022; 302: 134815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134815
  20. Qi J., Jiang G., Wan Y., Liu J., Pi F. Nanomaterials-modulated Fenton reactions: Strategies, chemodynamic therapy and future trends. Chem. Eng. J. 2023; 466: 142960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142960
  21. Kannaiah K.P., Sugumaran A., Chanduluru H.K., Rathinam S. Environmental impact of greenness assessment tools in liquid chromatography – a review. Microchem. J. 2021; 170: 106685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.106685
  22. Sultana M., Rownok M.H., Sabrin M., Rahaman M.H., Alam S.N. A review on experimental chemically modified activated carbon to enhance dye and heavy metals adsorption. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022; 6: 100382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100382
  23. Jafari M., Vanoppen M., Van Agtmaal J.M.C., Cornelissen E.R., Vrouwenvelder J.S., Verliefde A., et al. Cost of fouling in full-scale reverse osmosis and nanofiltration installations in the Netherlands. Desalination. 2021; 500(7): 114865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114865
  24. Vymazal J., Zhao Y., Mander Ü. Recent research challenges in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A review. Ecol. Eng. 2021; 169(5): 106318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106318
  25. Wang J., Chen X. Removal of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in various wastewater treatment processes: An overview. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022; 52(4): 571–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1835124

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © , 2025



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.