Subjective social mobility of university graduates through the lenses of their educational trajectories

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article examines patterns of subjective social mobility of Russian universities’ graduates based on the longitudinal database ”Trajectories in education and career“. Using a scale of a ten-step ”social ladder“ the following results were obtained. First, university graduates are more likely to experience a downward status transition and are unlikely exposed to a pronounced upward mobility or reproduction of high status; so they are more often characterized by immobility in average status positions. Higher education does not consolidate status privileges in the youth cohort and does not always play the social elevator role. Second, the analysis of mobility patterns in the context of trajectories on the way to university showed that university graduates previously graduated from high school are characterized by reproduction of high status. Last, trajectories with master’s degree turned out to be more ”risky“ than with only baccalaureate: master’s degree graduates are more likely to move either up or down the social ladder, while undergraduate trajectories are more characterized by status reproduction. The results of the study offer new empirical ground to consider higher education as a ”non-homogeneous“ level of education and its ambiguous role in social mobility.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anastasiia A. Lukina

Institute of Education, HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: aalukina@hse.ru

Junior Research Fellow

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vera A. Maltseva

Institute of Education, HSE University

Email: vamaltseva@hse.ru

PhD, Director of the Centre for Skills Development and Vocational Education

Russian Federation, Moscow

Natalya Ya. Rozenfeld

Institute of Education, HSE University

Email: nrozenfeld@hse.ru

Research Intern

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Altonji J. G., Zhong L. (2021) The Labor Market Returns to Advanced Degrees. Journal of Labor Economics. No. 39(2): 303–360.
  2. Cheng S. (2014) A life course trajectory framework for understanding the intracohort pattern of wage inequality. American Journal of Sociology. No. 120(3): 633–700.
  3. Chirkina T. A., Guseynova A. G. (2021) Social differentiation of educational plans for admission to universities. Monitoring of education markets and organizations bulletin. No. 12. Moscow: NIU VSHE. (In Russ.)
  4. Duru-Bellat M., Kieffer A. Objective/subjective: The two facets of social mobility. Sociologie du travail. 2008. Vol. 50. No. 4: e1–e18.
  5. Epikhina Y. B. (2023) Well-being as an Indicator of Subjective Mobility. Mir Rossii. Sociologiya. Etnologiya [Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology]. No. 32(3): 97–118. (In Russ.)
  6. Gimpelson V. E. (2019) Age and Wage: Stylized Facts and Russian Evidence. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal VSHE [HSE Economic Journal]. No. 2: 185–237. (In Russ.)
  7. Gimpelson V. E., Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2023) Job structure evolution in Russia: Polarization, upgrading, stalemate? Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of Economic]. No. 1: 59–85. (In Russ.)
  8. Gugushvili A. (2021) Why do people perceive themselves as being downwardly or upwardly mobile? Acta Sociologica. No. 64(1): 3–23.
  9. Jackman M., Jackman R. (1973) An Interpretation of the Relation Between Objective and Subjective Social Status. American Sociological Review. Vol. 38 (October).
  10. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2021) Returns to Education in Russia: Nowhere Lower? Working Paper WP3/2021/03. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
  11. Kelley J., Evans M. D.R. (1995) Class and Class Conflict in Six Western Nations. American Sociological Review. No. 60: 157–178.
  12. Lukina A. A. (2023) Educational Trajectories of First-Generation Students as a Case of Inequality in Higher Education. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 2: 133–160. (In Russ.)
  13. Lukyanova A. L. (2010) Returns to education in Russia: Evidence from meta-analysis. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal VSHE [HSE Economic Journal]. No. 14(3): 326–348.
  14. Malinovskiy S. S., Shibanova E.Yu. (2022) Access to higher education in Russia: how to turn expansion into equality. Vol. 7(67). Modern education analytics. Moscow: NIU VSHE. (In Russ.)
  15. Maltseva V. A., Rozenfeld N.Ya. (2022) Educational and Career Trajectories of the Russian Youth in a Longitudinal Perspective: A Case of University Graduates. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 3: 99–148. (In Russ.)
  16. Maltseva V. A., Shabalin A. I. (2021) The non-bypass trajectory, or the boom in demand for TVET in Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 2: 10–42. (In Russ.)
  17. Mareeva S. V., Slobodenyuk E. D., Anikin V. A. (2022) Public tolerance for social inequalities in turbulent Russia: reassessing the role of subjective mobility. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 1: 39–60. (In Russ.)
  18. OECD. (2018) Broken Social Elevator?: How to Promote Social Mobility. OECD Publishing.
  19. Roshchin et al. (2022) Graduates of higher education in the Russian labor market: trendas and challenges. Moscow: NIU VSHE. (In Russ.)
  20. Roshchin et al. (2023) Graduates of secondary vocational education in the Russian labor market. Moscow: NIU VSHE. (In Russ.)
  21. Rozhkova K., Roshchin S., Solntsev S. A., Travkin P. V. (2021) The return to master’s degree in the Russian labor market. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 8: 69–92. (In Russ.)
  22. Rozhkova K. V., Roshchin S.Yu., Solntsev S. A., Travkin P. V. (2023) The Differentiation of Quality in Higher Education and Graduates’ Wages in Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 1: 161– 190. (In Russ.)
  23. Tikhonova N.Ye. (2018a) Subjective stratification of Russian society model and its dynamic. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii [Bulletin of public opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussions]. No. 1–2(126): 17–29. (In Russ.)
  24. Tikhonova N.Ye. (2018b) Stratification by life chances of mass strata in modern Russian society. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 53–65.
  25. Tikhonova N.Ye. (2021) Intergenerational reproduction of professional statuses and class in modern Russian society. Voprosy teoreticheskoj ekonomiki [Questions of Theoretical Economics]. No. 2: 61– 78. (In Russ.)
  26. Wakeling P., Laurison D. (2017) Are postgraduate qualifications the ‘new frontier of social mobility’? The British journal of sociology. Vol. 68(3): 533–555.
  27. Weber M. Class, Status, Parties (fragments from the book “Economy and Society”). Lichnost. Kultura. Obschestvo [Personality. Culture. Society]. Vol. 5. No. 1–2 (15–16): 139–156.
  28. Yastrebov G., Kosyakova Y., Kurakin D. (2018) Slipping Past the Test: Heterogeneous Effects of Social Background in the Context of Inconsistent Selection Mechanisms in Higher Education. Sociology of Education. Vol. 91. No. 3: 224–241.
  29. Zagirova F. R., Romanenko K. R., Makareva A.Yu. (2019) ”Everyone is so different“ Academic heterogeneity of students: analysis, perception, practices. Vol. 4 (25). Moscow: NIU VSHE. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The highest level of education of 25-year-olds, % of the sample

Download (86KB)
3. Fig. 2. Distribution of estimates of the subjective status of youth, % (N = 3560)

Download (57KB)
4. Fig. 3. The proportion of respondents with different mobility patterns, the full sample (N = 3560) and a subsample of university graduates (N = 1776), % of the sample

Download (88KB)
5. Fig. 4. The proportion of respondents with the final set of mobility patterns, a complete sample (N = 3560) and a subsample of university graduates, the tenth wave of trails (N = 1776), % of the sample

Download (71KB)
6. Fig. 5. Self-assessment of one's own and parental status according to three status levels, % of the participants (N = 3560)

Download (46KB)
7. Fig. 6. Assessment of subjective status by three status levels depending on the level of education4, % of participants (N = 3560)

Download (55KB)
8. Fig. 7. Assessment of subjective parental status depending on the level of education, % of the participants (N = 3560)

Download (61KB)
9. Figure 8. Subjective social mobility of 25-year-olds, % of participants (N = 3560)

Download (63KB)
10. Fig. 9. Patterns of downward mobility of youth, % of participants

Download (46KB)
11. Fig. 10. Subjective social mobility of university graduates by the age of 25 in the context of educational trajectories leading to higher education, % (N = 1776)

Download (124KB)
12. Fig. 11. Subjective social mobility of university graduates by the age of 25 in the context of educational trajectories within higher education, the share of participants in the trajectory, % (N = 1776)

Download (113KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences