Annual growth and primary production of sphagnum in raised bog Mukhrino (four-year observations: 2019-2022)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The linear growth and primary production of Sphagnum is an important parameter for estimation of carbon balance of peatland ecosystems, given large areas these landscapes cover in the Western Siberia. Sphagnum represents the largest pull of biomass in raised bogs, which in anoxic conditions becomes peat, storing the preserved sources of carbon. Primary production estimates of different Sphagnum species are well studied globally, different authors studied many parameters of growth and production in natural and experimental conditions. The main parameters defining the growth and primary production are: the species biology, humidity, nutrient balance and photosynthetic radiation. Regional monitoring of carbon balance requires local estimates of Sphagnum linear growth and production, registered for specific regional species for a number of years, covering temporal and spatial dynamics. This was the scope of the monitoring program, initiated in Mukhrino field station of Yugra State University in middle taiga zone of Western Siberia 4 years ago.

To cover biological, spatial and temporal variability of Sphagnum linear growth and productivity, a series of permanent plots was established in Mukhrino field station in October 2018. The plots were located along the boardwalks of the station to protect the surface of peatland during permanent monitoring. Eight species of Sphagnum were chosen, each species was measured in 2-3 plots to cover spatial variation, totaling in 27 plots. Each plot contains about 20 markers established to measure growth of a particular species in an exact location. Two types of markers were used for upright-growing (“wire brush”) and side-growing (“individual ring”) species of Sphagnum. The markers were attached at the end of vegetation season (October) and were measured a year after (the exact dates of measurements were 09.10.2019, 17.10.2020, 09.10.2021 и 13.09.2022). Additionally, a sample of Sphagnum carpet 1 dm3 was extracted from each plot on the date of measurements for estimation of Sphagnum productivity (to calculate the dry weight of 1-cm shoots per 1 dm2, which is then multiplied by a mean annual increment on this plot). To estimate the parameters of linear growth and production, we measured the water level below the surface and described vegetation composition on each plot. Part of plots were established under experimental warming conditions using Open Top Chambers which raised temperature on 1.5˚C on average. Climatic parameters were measured using an automatic weather station in the near proximity to the plots.

Totally 1574 measurements of Sphagnum linear growth increment and 200 estimates of Sphagnum primary production were made during the four-years period.           The collected data were organized in a dataset using Darwin Core standard and published through Global Biodiversity Information Facility to be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable by any researcher or project in this discipline. The analytical tools (R scripts) which were applied for the analyses of these data were published in GitHub and could be accessed and reproduced. Additionally, we made a literature database to integrate data of Sphagnum linear growth from published sources and compare our data with the previous results.

The following results were estimated during the study. The linear growth increment of eight species of Sphagnum varied from 1.6 to 3 (mean between species 2.1) cm per year. The species in ascending order of annual growth: S. divum (1.6 cm per year), S. fuscum (1.7), S. capillifolium (1.7), S. papillosum (1.9), S. jensenii (2.7), S. angustifolium (3), S. majus (4.5 cm per year). The annual primary production varied from 1.2 to 3.7 (mean between species 2.3) g/dm2. The species in ascending order of annual primary production: S. divum (1.2 g/dm2 per year), S. papillosum (2.1), S. fuscum (2.1), S. jensenii (2.2), S. angustifolium (2.2), S. balticum (2.3), S. capillifolium (2.5), S. majus (3.7). There are statistically significant differences in annual growth increments and primary production between some species, while others are the same. The specific year has significant influence on growth increment and primary production on average for Sphagnum species, but different species have positive or negative impact. There is statistically significant correlation between bog water level and growth increment for four species: two species with positive impact and two species with negative impact. When averaged for two habitats (treed bogs and Sphagnum lawns), the annual growth increments statistically differ, while the primary production is the same. There wasn’t statistical effect of raised temperature (Open Top Chambers) on Sphagnum linear growth.

We used literature data to compare our estimates of linear growth increment and primary production with other studies. The statistical analysis proved some difference for three species, but in general our data confirm the global trends.

The following conclusions could be used in modelling of carbon stock in regional models of raised bog ecosystems: 1) there is statistical difference between mean growth increment and primary production of different species of Sphagnum; 2) the specific year weather parameters influence growth and production, based on interannual variation; 3) the averaged linear growth estimates of two habitats (treed bogs and Sphagnum lawns) differ significantly, but there wasn’t statistical difference for primary production between habitats; 4) the linear growth of some species could be influenced by water level, negatively or positively for different species; 5) the mean estimates of species-specific linear growth increment and primary production coincide with literature-based information and could be used in modelling of regional scenarios of carbon cycle.

About the authors

N. V. Filippova

Yugra State University

Email: filippova.courlee.nina@gmail.com

N. P. Kosykh

Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry of the Siberian Branch of the RAS

Email: filippova.courlee.nina@gmail.com

I. V. Filippov

Yugra State University

Email: filippova.courlee.nina@gmail.com

A. V. Niyazova

Yugra State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: filippova.courlee.nina@gmail.com

References

  1. Aerts R., Wallen B., Malmer N. 1992. Growth-limiting nutrients in Sphagnum-dominated bogs subject to low and high atmospheric nitrogen supply. Journal of ecology, 1(80): 131-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261070
  2. Aerts R., Wallén B., Malmer N., De Caluwe H. 2001. Nutritional constraints on Sphagnum-growth and potential decay in northern peatlands. Journal of Ecology, 2 (89): 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00539.x
  3. Bache S., Wickham H. 2022. magrittr: A forward-pipe operator for R. R package version 2.0.3. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=magrittr.
  4. Bengtsson F., Rydin H., Baltzer J.L., Bragazza L., Bu Z.J., Caporn S.J., Dorrepaal E., Flatberg K.I., Galanina O., Gałka M., Ganeva A. 2020. Environmental drivers of Sphagnum growth in peatlands across the Holarctic region. Journal of Ecology, 109(1): 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13499
  5. Breeuwer A., Heijmans M.M., Robroek B.J., Berendse F. 2008. The effect of temperature on growth and competition between Sphagnum species. Oecologia, 1(156): 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-0963-8
  6. Buttler A., Robroek B.J., Laggoun Défarge F., Jassey V.E., Pochelon C., Bernard G., Delarue F., Gogo S., Mariotte P., Mitchell E.A., Bragazza L. 2015. Experimental warming interacts with soil moisture to discriminate plant responses in an ombrotrophic peatland. Journal of vegetation Science, 26(5): 964-974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12296
  7. Clymo R. S. 1970. The Growth of Sphagnum: methods of measurement. Journal of Ecology, 1(58): 13-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258168
  8. Clymo R. S. 1973. The growth of Sphagnum: some effects of environment. Journal of Ecology, 3(61): 849-869. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258654
  9. Clymo R. S., Hayward P. M. 1983. Bryophyte ecology. In: The Ecology of Sphagnum, (A. J. E. Smith, ed.), Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 229-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5891-3_8
  10. Dyukarev E., Zarov E., Alekseychik P., Nijp J., Filippova N., Mammarella I., Filippov I., Bleuten W., Khoroshavin V., Ganasevich G., Meshcheryakova A., Vesala T., Lapshina E. 2021. The multiscale monitoring of peatland ecosystem carbon cycling in the middle taiga zone of Western Siberia: the Mukhrino bog case study. Land, 10(8): 824. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080824
  11. Filippova N., Kosykh N. 2023. Sphagnum annual growth and primary production measurements (Mukhrino field station, West Siberia) (2018-2022). Version 1.12. Yugra State University Biological Collection (YSU BC). Occurrence dataset. https://doi.org/10.15468/fcz7at Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  12. Gaudig G., Krebs M., Joosten H. 2017. Sphagnum farming on cut-over bog in NW Germany: Long-term studies on Sphagnum growth . Mires & Peat, 20(4): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2016.OMB.238
  13. Gaudig G., Krebs M., Joosten H. 2020. Sphagnum growth under N saturation: interactive effects of water level and P or K fertilization. Plant Biology, 22(3): 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13092
  14. Gunnarsson U. 2005. Global patterns of Sphagnum productivity. Journal of Bryology, 3(27): 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328205X70029
  15. Gunnarsson U., Rydin H. 2000. Nitrogen fertilization reduces Sphagnum production in bog communities. The New Phytologist, 147(3): 527-537. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00717.x
  16. Hayward P. M., Clymo R. S. 1983. The growth of sphagnum: experiments on, and simulation of, some effects of light flux and water-table depth. Journal of Ecology, 3(71): 845-863. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259597
  17. Henry L., Wickham H. 2022. purrr: functional programming tools. R package version 0.3.5. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=purrr Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  18. Kassambara A. 2020. ggpubr: 'ggplot2' based publication ready plots. R package version 0.4.0. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  19. Kassambara A. 2021. rstatix: pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. R package version 0.7.0. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix> Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  20. Kassambara A. 2022. ggcorrplot: visualization of a correlation matrix using 'ggplot2'. R package version 0.1.4. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggcorrplot Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  21. Küttim M., Küttim L., Ilomets M., Laine A.M. 2020. Controls of Sphagnum growth and the role of winter. Ecological Research, 35(1): 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12074
  22. Laine A.M., Juurola E., Hájek T., Tuittila E.S. 2011. Sphagnum growth and ecophysiology during mire succession. Oecologia, 167: 1115-1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2039-4
  23. Limpens J., Berendse F. 2003. Growth reduction of Sphagnum magellanicum subjected to high nitrogen deposition: the role of amino acid nitrogen concentration. Oecologia, 135: 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1224-5
  24. Lindholm T., Vasander H. 1990. Production of eight species of Sphagnum at Suurisuo mire, southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici, 27(2): 145-157.
  25. Loisel J., Gallego-Sala A.V., Yu Z. 2012. Global-scale pattern of peatland Sphagnum growth driven by photosynthetically active radiation and growing season length. Biogeosciences, 9(7): 2737–2746. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-2737-2012
  26. McNeil P., Waddington J. M. 2003. Moisture controls on Sphagnum growth and CO2 exchange on a cutover bog. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2(40): 354-367. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00790.x
  27. Mironov V. L., Kondratev A.Y., Mironova A.V. 2020. Growth of Sphagnum is strongly rhythmic: contribution of the seasonal, circalunar and third components. Physiologia Plantarum, 168(4): 765-776. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13037
  28. Mironov V.L., Grabovik S.I., Ignashov P.A., Kantserova L.V. 2016. Geotropic curvature of Sphagnum: environmental features of their genesis and trial application for estimation shoot length increment. Arctoa, 25(2): 352-363. https://doi.org/10.15298/arctoa.25.27
  29. Moore T. R. 1989. Growth and net production of Sphagnum at five fen sites, subarctic eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany, 4(67): 1203-1207. https://doi.org/10.1139/b89-156
  30. R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/. Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  31. Sonesson M., Carlsson B.Å., Callaghan T.V., Halling S., Björn L.O., Bertgren M., Johanson U. 2002. Growth of two peat-forming mosses in subarctic mires: species interactions and effects of simulated climate change. Oikos, 99(1): 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990115.x
  32. Sonesson M., Persson S., Basilier K., Stenström T.A. 1980. Growth of Sphagnum riparium Ångstr. In Relation to Some Environmental Factors in the Stordalen Mire. Ecological Bulletins, 30: 191-207.
  33. Vitt D. H. 2007. Estimating Moss and Lichen Ground Layer Net Primary Production in Tundra, peatlands and forests. In: Principles and standards for measuring primary production, (T. Fahey, A. Knapp, eds.), Oxford University Press, New York pp. 82-105.
  34. Wei T., Simko V. 2021. R package 'corrplot': Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. (Version 0.92). URL: https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot. Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  35. Whinam J., Buxton R. 1997. Sphagnum peatlands of Australasia: an assessment of harvesting sustainability. Biological Conservation, 82(1): 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00015-3
  36. Wickham H. 2007. Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(12). URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/v21/i12/ Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  37. Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. URL: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. Last accessed 15.02.2023.
  38. Wickham H., Averick M., Bryan J., Chang W., McGowan L.D., Francois R., Grolemund G., Hayes A., Henry L., Hester J., Kuhn M., Pedersen T.L., Miller E., Bache S.M., Muller K., Ooms J., Robinson D., Seidel D.P., Spinu V., Takahashi K., Vaughan D., Wilke C., Woo K., Yutani H. 2019. Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 43. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. MuSGrowth_literature_db
Download (624KB)
3. MuSGrowth_occurrence
Download (519KB)
4. MuSGrowth_vegetation
Download (9KB)
5. MuSGrowh_literature_db_citations
Download (19KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Filippova N.V., Kosykh N.P., Filippov I.V., Mescheryakova A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies